SC Court Upholds Ruling in Charleston Carriage Works Case

News Summary

The South Carolina Court of Appeals upheld a ruling dismissing a defamation lawsuit by Charleston Carriage Works against animal advocacy groups. The case, stemming from a controversial video of a horse named Big John collapsing, found the video protected as free speech related to public concern. The court noted Charleston Carriage Works failed to prove actual malice required for defamation claims. Advocacy groups view this outcome as a victory for animal rights and free speech, potentially influencing future legal protections for public advocacy.

Charleston – In a significant ruling, the South Carolina Court of Appeals upheld a 2022 decision that dismissed a defamation lawsuit filed by Charleston Carriage Works against two animal advocacy groups. The court’s affirmation came after a lengthy legal battle initiated in 2018, which stemmed from a controversial video showing a horse named Big John collapsing during a carriage tour in Charleston.

The lawsuit revolved around a video that was uploaded by the Charleston Animal Society and Carriage Horse Advocates, which has since accumulated over 77,000 views on YouTube. The video depicted Big John, who was pulling a carriage loaded with customers, falling to the ground and lying there. In response, the animal advocacy groups alleged potential maltreatment and expressed concerns regarding the horse’s well-being and treatment.

The court found that Charleston Carriage Works did not establish the required actual malice needed to support a defamation claim. Furthermore, the court noted that the video constituted protected speech that addressed a matter of public concern, which contributed to its ruling. Master-in-Equity Judge Mikell Scarborough’s earlier summary judgment that dismissed the case was therefore upheld.

During the legal proceedings, Charleston Carriage Works contended that the video misrepresented the incident, asserting that Big John had merely tripped rather than being harmed. The company claimed that the horse could get up without assistance, refuting allegations made by the animal rights groups in the video, who questioned whether the horse was exhausted or had indeed tripped. However, the court emphasized the need for supporting evidence related to the arguments put forth by Charleston Carriage Works, noting that many lacked substantial backing.

This court ruling has been perceived as a victory by the CEO of Charleston Animal Society, who expressed satisfaction with the outcome. The case also raised discussions about SLAPP (Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation) implications, as the advocacy groups faced the lawsuit, which some argue was retaliatory for their public criticisms of the carriage industry.

In light of these ongoing discussions, a proposed South Carolina Public Expression Protection Act aims to enhance legal protections against retaliatory lawsuits that infringe on rights to free speech and public advocacy. This proposed legislation would potentially offer a framework to better protect individuals and groups who express concerns regarding ethical issues, such as those surrounding the treatment of working animals.

The case has highlighted continuing debates regarding the ethical treatment of carriage horses in Charleston and the role of public advocacy in these matters. As animal welfare remains a critical public interest issue, it raises questions about the responsibilities of companies operating in the tourism sector to ensure the safety and health of the animals involved in their operations. The ruling is significant not only for the parties involved but also for broader conversations surrounding animal rights and advocacy in the state.

Charleston Carriage Works has indicated plans to continue appealing the ruling, signaling that the dialogue regarding the treatment of horses in the carriage industry will likely persist. The case serves as a reminder of the tensions between animal advocacy, free speech, and commercial interests in the tourism sector.

Deeper Dive: News & Info About This Topic

HERE Resources

Additional Resources

• Post and Courier: Charleston Carriage Works Video Not Defamatory
• Live 5 News: Libel Lawsuit Over Viral Carriage Horse Video Ends in Activist’s Favor
• ABC News 4: Former Berkeley High Football Coach Awarded $200K in Defamation Lawsuit
• Wikipedia: Defamation
• The State: Defamation Case News
• Encyclopedia Britannica: Free Speech