News Summary
Two immigration lawyers in Massachusetts received alarming erroneous deportation notices from the federal government, raising serious concerns about accuracy in communications related to immigration enforcement. The notices, sent from a no-reply email address, included threats of self-deportation despite the lawyers being U.S. citizens. The Department of Homeland Security has acknowledged the mistake, citing potential communication failures as widespread issues affecting many individuals. These incidents have highlighted the challenges and fears surrounding immigration policies and enforcement practices.
Error in Deportation Notices Leaves Attorneys Alarmed
Massachusetts Immigration Attorneys Experience Unsettling Emails from Government
A startling incident has arisen in Massachusetts where two immigration attorneys received erroneous deportation notices from the federal government. This has sent shockwaves through the legal community and raised significant questions about the accuracy of government communications surrounding immigration enforcement.
NICOLE MICHERONI, a 40-year-old U.S. citizen and seasoned immigration lawyer, was taken aback when she received an email directing her to leave the country within seven days. The communication, laden with ominous wording, stated that her “parole status had been terminated,” leaving her puzzled as a lifelong citizen born in Newton. Micheroni described the email as a threatening missive that resembled spam more than an official notification.
Government Acknowledgment of Mistakes
The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) confirmed that Customs and Border Protection (CBP) may have mistakenly sent out termination notices to individuals not fitting the criteria, including American citizens. This alarming revelation only deepens misunderstandings, especially when legal professionals are caught in the crosshairs of administrative errors.
Micheroni, whose experience went viral on social media, reported a flood of responses from concerned parties globally. From attorneys to ordinary citizens, the reactions highlighted widespread concern regarding the implications of such mistakes in an already tense immigration environment. The overwhelming sentiment points to fears that these communications may be tools intended to instill fear regarding immigration enforcement.
Sister in the Fight: Carmen Bello
Adding to this unsettling narrative, another U.S. citizen and immigration attorney, CARMEN BELLO, recounted a similar episode. Bello received an email instructing her to self-deport despite having lived legally in the U.S. for nearly two decades. This raises serious concerns about the vetting process that DHS employs when sending out such critical information, as the notifications appear to originate from contact associations without verifying the identities of recipients.
Bello pointed out that both attorneys received these emails from a no-reply address, devoid of specific names or case numbers, which further compounds the confusion and concerns surrounding the validity of the messages. The implications of such oversights are significant, especially when they target highly sensitive groups, including asylum seekers.
A Serious Systematic Oversight
Both Micheroni’s and Bello’s experiences stem from a troubling pattern of miscommunication from the DHS and CBP. Reports indicate that this may be a part of a systematic effort, targeting those who applied for parole through recent applications. The DHS has recognized that known email addresses may have erroneously included individuals who should not have received these notices at all.
With alarming headers such as “Notice of Termination of Parole,” recipients are left wondering how such unlawful communications can be approved. The agencies have confirmed they are monitoring communication regarding these notices and will address the issues on a case-by-case basis – a promise that doesn’t alleviate the immediate concerns of those affected.
Legal Implications and Expert Insights
Experts have been quick to point out that any attempt to deport U.S. citizens is illegal, emphasizing that removing these individuals from the country would constitute a serious infringement of rights. Micheroni hopes her situation is merely an administrative error, and while she has not reached out to Homeland Security for clarification, the larger pattern raises significant concerns about the accuracy of government communications in matters of immigration enforcement.
Once thought to be secure in their positions, the alarming emails experienced by Micheroni and Bello reveal vulnerabilities that shake the foundations of trust in the governmental process, prompting a call for greater accountability and assurance in how these critical communications are disseminated to every individual they affect.
Deeper Dive: News & Info About This Topic
HERE Resources
Lawyer Claims Immigrant’s Arrest in Upstate NY was Illegal
Louisiana Lawmakers Tackle Personal Injury Lawsuits Amid Insurance Crisis
Disturbing Email Incident Shocks Immigration Lawyers
Breaux Law Firm Welcomes New Lawyer Kristen Hartley
Baltimore Lawyer Sentenced: A Cautionary Tale
Florida Lawyer Sparks Legal Battle Over Immigration Policies
Justice Department Fires Immigration Lawyer Amid Controversy
Lawyer Alina Habba Investigates New Jersey Immigration Policies
Massachusetts Lawyer Shocked by Deportation Email from DHS
Immigration Lawyer Faces Deportation Notice Despite Citizenship
Additional Resources
- NBC10 Boston
- Boston.com
- WBUR
- Reuters
- CNN
- Wikipedia: Immigration Law
- Google Search: U.S. Citizens Deportation Notices
- Google Scholar: Immigration Lawyer Experiences Errors
- Encyclopedia Britannica: Immigration
- Google News: Immigration Attorneys Error Notices

Author: STAFF HERE CHARLESTON
The HERE Charleston Staff Writers are a collaborative team of journalists, editors, and local contributors passionate about delivering accurate, timely information to the Charleston community. As part of the HEREcity.com Network, which powers over 100 U.S. city sites including HEREcolumbia.com, our staff draws on collective experience in South Carolina journalism to cover everything from business sales and real estate developments to dining deals and community initiatives. Our Expertise and Background: Local Roots in Charleston : Our team includes lifelong Charleston residents and SC natives with deep knowledge of the area’s history, economy, and culture. We’ve covered key events like the recent sale of the historic Crofts Block Building, Charleston's equestrian heritage, and growth in local tech and education sectors (e.g., Charleston Technical College programs). Collective Experience: With over 50 combined years in journalism, our staff has backgrounds in print, digital media, and community reporting. We prioritize fact-based stories, drawing from sources like the Charleston Chamber of Commerce, city government records, and on-the-ground interviews. Commitment to Quality: Every article is a group effort, involving research, editing, and verification to ensure reliability. We adhere to journalistic standards, citing credible sources and updating content as new details emerge.